Relations
ObjectBox db supports relations. Learn all about To-One, To-Many, One-to-Many, Many-to-Many relations and lazy loading for ObjectBox Go. Relations are initialized eagerly by default.
Objects may reference other objects, for example using a simple reference or a list of objects. In database terms, we call those references relations. The object defining the relation we call the source object, the referenced object we call target object. So the relation has a direction.
If there is one target object, we call the relation to-one. And if there can be multiple target objects, we call it to-many.
Relations are initialized eagerly by default - i.e. the targets are loaded & as soon as the source object is read from the database. Lazy/manual loading of to-many relations is possible, using an annotation.
To-One Relations
You define a to-one relation using `link` annotation on a field that is a pointer or value type of another entity. Consider the following example - the Order entity has a to-one relation to the Customer entity.
model.go
type Order struct {
Id uint64
Customer *Customer `objectbox:"link"`
Notes string
}
type Customer struct {
Id uint64
Name string
}
Now let's add a customer with a few orders.
main.go
// note that here we're creating a new customer
// but we could have also reused an existing one
var customer = &model.Customer{Name: "ACME Inc."}
var box = model.BoxForOrder(ob)
// Insert a new order. ObjectBox also inserts the customer automatically
// because it's new (customer.Id == 0 at this point)
box.Put(&model.Order{
Notes: "first order, new customer",
Customer: customer,
})
...
// Add another order. Now the customer.Id is already > 0
// so it's not inserted again, just referenced
box.Put(&model.Order{
Text: "second order, existing customer",
Customer: customer,
})
After the
box.Put has been executed on the first order, the customer.Id would be 1 because we're using pointers (Customer *Customer field) so Put could update the variable when it has inserted the Customer. Note that this wouldn't be possible if we were using copies (Customer Customer field) and in that case you should insert the customer manually into it's box first (or use an existing customer selected from the database).We can also read, update or remove the relationship to a customer:
main.go
var box = model.BoxForOrder(ob)
order, _ := box.Get(1) // Read
// at this point, order.Customer is already loaded automatically (eager-loading)
order.Customer = nil // Remove the relation
box.Put(order) // Update
// or do an update to a different customer
customers, _ := model.BoxForCustomer(ob).GetAll()
order.Customer = customers[2]
box.Put(order)
Note that removing the relation does not remove the customer from the database, it removes only the link between this specific order and the customer.
There is a slight difference if you require a one-to-many (1:N) or many-to-many (N:M) relation.
A 1:N relation is like the example above where a customer can have multiple orders, but an order is only associated with a single customer. An example for an N:M relation are students and teachers: students can have classes by several teachers but a teacher can also instruct several students.
One-to-Many (1:N)
Currently, one-to-many relations are defined implicitly as an opposite relation to a to-one relation as defined above. This is useful for queries, e.g. to select all customers with an order placed within the last seven days.
Many-to-Many (N:M)
To define a to-many relation, you can use a slice of entities - no need to specify the
link annotation this time because ObjectBox wouldn't know how to store a slice of structs by itself anyway so it assumes it must be a many-to-may relation. They're stored when you put the source entity and loaded when you read it from the database, unless you specify a lazy annotation in which case, they're loaded manually, using Box::GetRelated().Assuming a students and teachers example, this is how a simple student class that has a to-many relation to teachers can look like:
model.go
type Teacher struct {
Id uint64
Name string
}
type Student struct {
Id uint64
Name string
Teachers []*Teacher
}
Adding the teachers of a student works exactly like with a list:
main.go
var teacher1 = &model.Teacher{Name: "John Wise"}
var teacher2 = &model.Teacher{Name: "Peter Clever"}
var student1 = &model.Student{
Name: "Martin Curious",
// we can create the slice in place
Teachers: []*model.Teacher{teacher1, teacher2},
}
// or append to it
var student2 = &model.Student{Name: "Earl Eager"}
student2.Teachers = append(student2.Teachers, teacher2)
// puts students and teachers
var box = model.BoxForStudent(ob)
box.Put(student1)
box.Put(student2)
Similar to the to-one relations, related entities are inserted automatically if they are new. If the teacher entities do not yet exist in the database, the to-many will also put them. If they already exist, the to-many will only create the relation (but not put them).
To get the teachers of a student we just access the list:
main.go
var student1 = model.BoxForStudent(ob).Get(1);
for _, teacher := range student1.Teachers {
fmt.PrintLn(teacher.Name)
}
Remove and update work similar to insert - you just change the
student.Teachers slice to reflect the new state (i.e. remove element, add elements, etc) and box.Put(student). Note that if you want to change actual teacher data (e.g. change teachers name), you need to update the teacher entity itself, not just change it in one of the student.Teachers slice.In case the slices might contain many objects and you don't need to access the slice of the related objects each time you work with the source object, you may consider enabling the so called lazy-loading. You do that by specifying the `lazy` annotation on the field. Consider the updated model of the previous example:
model.go
type Teacher struct {
Id uint64
Name string
}
type Student struct {
Id uint64
Name string
Teachers []*Teacher `objectbox:"lazy"`
}
This way, when you read a
Student object, the Teachers field would be nil and you can work with the student as you wish, changing it and saving and the list of assigned teachers wouldn't change as long as the Teachers field stays nil. If it wasn't nil, but a slice of Teachers instead, ObjectBox would recognize this as an update of the field and replace the relational links.To access the list of
Teachers, we need to first load them. ObjectBox has generated a helper method just for thatmain.go
var box = model.BoxForStudent(ob)
var student1 = box.Get(1);
// at this point `student1.Teachers == nil`, so if we need it, we must load it first
box.GetRelated(student1) // loads all lazy-loaded relations
// or alternatively load just the Teachers property
// (useful if there were other lazy-loaded relations we didn't care about this time)
box.GetRelated(student1, Student_.Teachers)
// now the teachers are loaded and we can access them as usual
for _, teacher := range student1.Teachers {
fmt.PrintLn(teacher.Name)
}
To update the list of
Teachers, we can either overwrite the slice with completely new data (new slice), or if we want to keep the original data and update it, e.g. change a few items, we need to load them first the same way as when reading (above).main.go
var box = model.BoxForStudent(ob)
var student1 = box.Get(1);
// propagate student1.Teachers based on the current data in DB
box.GetRelated(student1, Student_.Teachers)
// add a new teacher to the existing
student1.Teachers = append(student1.Teachers, &model.Teacher{Name: "Peter Clever"})
// save the updated list, including a new teacher
box.Put(student1)
Last modified 8mo ago